Women s Rights Of Women - 1206 Words

It irritates me, to speak of women and the role of women in this election, the subject of women is tiresome but necessary in a world where gender is still existent as an obstacle for most. I cannot identify what woman is. I am basing my definition from our modern understanding of woman, our general view, and the popular experience. People are using younger women voting for Bernie Sanders as proof of gender’s irrelevant in this election, that women have achieved their rights. Even if women ‘have rights now’ it does not change people’s habits that are so embedded in our societies that it has become a custom to treat women as lesser. These gender roles are not altered by law alone but by de-socialization of a society that believes women to be less and believes they, the women, are less than men. Women, even women who are aware of gender’s troubles, are socialized to have a father, a male figure to take care of them, they, although they see themselves in Hillary Clinton, cannot feel safe in the hands of a woman. Supporters of Hillary and Bernie alike continuously talk of equality, that woman is equal to man. Not only does that not matter, but it also is not true. Every person is different and requires different needs. Gender is still in question; we can see the double standards th at apply to Hillary and excused to Bernie. Marx believes women’s oppression is purely economical. He believes with the exploitation of labor, women will also rise for a revolution and gain theirShow MoreRelatedWomen s Rights Of Women Essay1455 Words   |  6 Pagesa myriad of women have expressed through outlets such as public assemblies, literature, and speeches. There have been three waves of the women’s movement, each targeting a variety of issues within each era. The third wave was in 1995, where Hillary Clinton spoke in Beijing, China, claiming that women’s rights were the same as human rights, that every aspiring girl deserved the civil liberties that every man was given around the world. Moreover, the movement had shifted towards women in developingRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1265 Words   |  6 Pagesstands in the way of women being equal to men? Journalist Carlin Flora suggests the following, â€Å"While not all claims to humanity are universal and no one context, culture or continent can truly represent all peoples, the following three examples from very different contexts, cultures and continents show that some violations of women’s human rights are universal. In particular, it is still the case the world over that a woman’s reproductive rights, which impact on her right to life, are still seenRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women881 Words   |  4 PagesTwenty –first century ladies are discovering it a daunting task to keep up both sexual orientation parts as an aftereffect of the women s activist development. They are presently assuming liability for both the supplier and the nurturer, battling like never before to acquire and keep a superior personal satisfaction. Woman s rights has supported in equivalent vocation opportunity, battling to get ladies acknowledged into the employment advertise, and what initially began as ladies strengtheningRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women Essay1647 Words   |  7 Pagesthe early 1920’s, women thought t hey had achieved the unachievable. They could finally work, keep their earned wages, marry whomever they please, and even vote. After reaching their goal and fighting vigorously, women could taste equality and the freedom they deserved. While women still have the right to work in today’s society, women are not exactly treated equal in the workplace. Regardless of the past and the extreme measures taken to ensure equal opportunities for both men and women, there are manyRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1590 Words   |  7 Pagesthe 1920s, women were ignored in every aspect of their life. From politics, to social situations, women were constantly looked at as lesser. The 20s was a decade of women ready to fight for their rights. From gaining social freedoms, to getting political rights, the 20s was the first decade of feminism. Many women played key roles in the fight for women s rights through speeches, marches, and much more. The women that fought for their rights in the 1920 s completely changed how women live their livesRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1230 Words   |  5 PagesWomen’s suffrage has stretched from the 1800’s to present day, as women have struggled to have the same civil and constitutional rights as men in politics and be appreciated as equals in the workforce. Groups of women known as suffragists questioned the customary views of women’s roles. Eventually our nation has evolved and realized that male-controlled societies suppress women’s rights. From the beginning steps taken in 1850 to 2013 with women earning combat roles in the military, women’s rolesRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1393 Words   |  6 Pages Women all over the world are being treated different than men. Iran is one of the places that women are being treated the worst. From restrictions to punishments, women in Iran are being treated with no respect, and that is not okay. Women’s rights activists have tried to get it to cha nge, and have traveled to many places to try and get more people to join their movement. There are many issues with women not having the same rights as men. One of the main problems is that they are treated lessRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1272 Words   |  6 PagesThroughout history, women have fought a strenuous battle for equal rights. Many men, and even some women, all over the world believe that women do not share the same value and importance to society as men do. On September 5, 1995, Hillary Clinton spoke at the 4th World Conference on Women, on behalf of women all over the world. Clinton raised awareness on how women s rights are being violated and why it is important to recognize women s rights as equal to everyone else’s rights. Even today, in 2016Read MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1052 Words   |  5 PagesThe family has traditionally been the basic unit of Chinese society where women have long been charged with upholding society s values in their roles as wives and mothers. Especially in the Qing Dynasty, women were required to balance society s i deals with the reality of raising a family and maintaining a household. Throughout the imperial period and into the beginning of the twentieth century, the relationship among family members was prescribed by Confucian teachings. The revered philosopherRead MoreWomen s Rights Of Women1159 Words   |  5 PagesWomen’s Rights is an extremely ethical topic that is surrounded by ethical theories and has a lot of history. While some of the theoretical systems in ethics have helped to gain women their rights, others have assisted in preventing women rights. Women in America have seen much improvement in our modern day society regarding Women’s Rights, but what about the women in less economically stable countries? Women continue to fight against abuse, hatred, and discrimination worldwide. I will be discussing

America’s Foundation Free Essays

The United States Declaration of Independence written by Thomas Jefferson was a statement that was used on July 4, 1776 by the Continental Congress to declare the independence of thirteen American colonies from Britain. It entailed in part the following; political independence of every person as provided by natural law, right of revolution. By this, it implied that all Americans were entitled to equal rights and in cases where these rights were breached, anyone was entitled to revolt against the aggressor. We will write a custom essay sample on America’s Foundation or any similar topic only for you Order Now Another part of the declaration was a list of charges against king George who was seen as having dishonored the rights of colonialist therefore was seen as unfit to govern. Lastly, the declaration stipulated conditions under which people could change their government and Britain situation offered a perfect example. Hence it called on to all colonies to throw off British Crown and claim their independence (Library of Congress, 1861, 865). The article of Confederation The article of Confederation was the first governing constitution of America. The article sought to unite several States in America that were initially sovereign under the British regime. It was made in drafts with the last draft made in 1977 and adopted by Continental Congress on November 15, 1977. The article stipulated the rules and regulation to govern the new found United States confederation. Hence with the Article, United States was capable of making wars and settling interstates dispute diplomatically. Furthermore, United States was able to resolve issues concerning western territories. The articles were created with a view of providing freedom, Sovereignty and independence of America. With time, it was found that these articles were unable to provide sufficient provisions that would govern the country effectively hence a need for a detailed constitution that would replace the Confederation with the Federal. This paved way for the formation of a constitution in 1788 (Jensen, 1970, p 109). The constitution The constitution is the current governing body of law in United States of America. It is the supreme law of United States and is the source of legal authority fundamental to the existence of America and all its administrative and judicial bodies within it. It defines three arms of the government; the legislative led by Congress, an executive branch led by the President and judicial branch led by Supreme Court. In its description, it stipulates each branch powers that helps eliminate conflict of power during implementation. In addition, it established the federal system of government that gave individual states various rights. It was adopted on September 17, 1789 and has so far undergone twenty seven amendments (Hickey, 1853, 483) Comparison and Contrast between Articles of Confederation, Constitution and Declaration of Independence. There are various similarities and differences in the Declaration, Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. In comparison, all the above three documents sought to provide the sovereignty and independence of United States of America. They stipulated that US was a sovereign state that was capable of making laws, negotiating diplomatic relations and setting up its own army. America, therefore, was free to trade and govern itself under its own laws without any external interference. All three document emphasized on basic human right. This was stipulated through the provision for freedom of movement and expression in the constitution and the Article of Confederation. Equality and sovereignty of each state was also equally stipulated in three documents. Above all, the document stipulated the rules and regulation that would hence fourth govern United States of America. Breach of which would lead to prosecution and there after a punishment. Similarity among the documents can also be seen in their way of formation where by; representatives from various states were chosen to draft them and later sign on the document to authenticate them. In this sense, all the above three document are similar. Contrasts Among the notable differences are in levying taxes. In Articles of Confederation, Congress could only request various states to pay taxes but looking into the constitution, Congress has the right to levy taxes on individuals. On the Executive side, the Constitution provides the president with powers to choose cabinet members and has power to check on the powers of judiciary and legislature, however, the article provided the president with no executive powers and his role was only to preside over the Congress. On amending the constitution, two thirds of both houses of congress and three quarter of senate legislature are needed to amend the constitution under the provision of the current constitution compared to thirteen out of thirteen as provided by the Article. With the Article, it recommended that sovereignty remained within States however; the constitution states that it is the supreme law of the land hence sovereignty applies within the range of constitution. Regarding trade, Article provided no control of trade within states and no regulation what so ever was done between interstate trades. This implied that there was free movement of goods and services within states without government interference. However, constitution provides for regulation of trades between states and the power is bestowed to the Congress which oversees all these regulations. In formation of an army to provide military support, Article of Confederation awarded no right to the congress to draft troops that would participate in war. Hence, they had to rely on military contribution by various states. In the Constitution, Congress has the power to raise an army that would deal with any military emergency in the country. In conclusion, it can be asserted that without these three documents in US history, the legality of United States of America could be at stake and therefore, it would have become difficult to govern all the states under one government. References Faber H. , Faber, Doris. (1987). We the People: The Story of the United States Constitution since 1787. New York: Scribner’s. Hickey, W. (1853). The Constitution of the United States of America: With an Alphabetical Analysis; the Declaration of Independence †¦ Electoral Votes for All the Presidents and Vice-presidents: the High Authorities and Civil Officers of Government from March 4, 1789, to March 3. T. K. P. G. Collins . pp 483. Jensen M. (1970). The Articles of Confederation: An Interpretation of the Social-constitutional History of the American Revolution 1774-1781. University of Wisconsin Press. Library of Congress (1861). Catalogue of the Library of Congress. Oxford University. Pp 865. Suksi M. (1993). Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. US History. Articles of Confederation Vs the Constitution. http://home. earthlink. net/~gfeldmeth/chart. art Accessed on February 26, 2009. How to cite America’s Foundation, Papers

Law of Criminology and Criminal justice †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Law of Criminology and Criminal justice. Answer: Introduction Since ancient times, politics has been the driving force of the human civilization, its customs and its survival along with its right hand, the law. Politics can be defined as the method that involves the various processes by which a nation or a country and its people can be governed by a single ruling party after several sessions of debate and a majority poll by the people of a the democratic republic. When such a party takes it upon itself to govern a nation, it needs a string of stringentlaws to manage peace and order. Laws can be defined as a system that is developed in such a way that each and every action of the individual living in a country is monitored, checked and regulated. If such a system is broken by a single being, then that person is bound by the country and its legislations to get penalized and punished for the breach of the standardized code. By the above discussion, it is now clear that all laws are authorized by the ruling political party itself and also has a strong grasp on the criminal justice system as well. Since such parties have to get along with other entities like the media, other parties, its donors and several business organizations, they sometimes have to take justice for themselves at almost every level of Criminal Justice as analyzed in this report. Selection of Decision Makers Judges are the key decision makers in a court oflaw or a legal justice system. The judges are selected by ether a polling process or by directly being appointed by a higher authority (Luban, 2013). Either way, their appointment is always directly or indirectly linked to the political system. If we suppose the selection process is that of polling, then, the decision is solely based on the fact that if the candidate is popular or not. Such populism may directly be linked to how a candidate is shown to the voters. Even if the candidate is not actually appealing by character but acts impressionable and righteous in front of the voters, they will get the attention (Akhavan, 2013). Politics in Creation of Laws Members of the Congress and often the legislation of the state play a huge role in passing and amendment of laws (Baylis et al, 2017). Such members have their affiliations to a certain party and a standing in the society, hence, not all their decisions are based for the sole purpose of welfare of the public, but to benefit political interests and selfish reasons. Such situations are most common when media is hysterical or public goodwill is needed during pre election campaigns. Political involvement of Persecutors Persecutor appointment is done on both state and federal levels. Such attorneys when appointed, in order to further their careers have to have some attachment to the strings of politics (Cliffsnotes.com, 2017). In order for them to not suffer a loss and get reappointed when need be, such attorneys need to support politics actively whenever necessary. Often, when it comes to advancement in career opportunities, prosecutors ignore the impartiality of a righteous judgment and take consideration in political lines, thinking otherwise to favor a selfish case (Daily Kos., 2017). The International Court of Justice The International Court of Justice is the most primary judicial branch of the United Nations the court settles legal disputes submitted to it by states and provides advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by duly authorized international branches, agencies, and the UN General Assembly. Few of the many aims and purposes of an international court of justice are to: Decide disputes of a justifiable nature that is to say, disputes which can be submitted to a court and be determined by principles of justice expressed in rules of law, which may and must of necessity arise between and among nations. To enable the court to act and to bring forth the fruits of justice, an agreement of the nations is required that such disputes shall at their beginning and before they assume political importance be automatically submitted to the tribunal. The International Court of Justice is an established tribunal that maintains law and order and settles various disputes; a couple of them would be ICTY and ICTR ICTY: The tribunal was established by Resolution 827 of the UNS Council, which was passed on the 25th of May 1993. It has jurisdiction over four clusters of crimes committed on the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991: grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, violations of the laws or customs of war, genocide, and crimes against humanity. The maximum sentence it can impose is life imprisonment. ICTR: was a tribunal established in November 1994 by the UNS Council in Resolution 955 with the aim to judge people responsible for the Rwandan Genocide and other serious violations of international law in Rwanda, or by Rwandan citizens in nearby states, between 1 January and 31 December 1994. By discussing the above practical examples, it can be seen how law and order can be and is present even when there are extreme political barriers and how justice is still relevant for guiding humanity. Both the above tribunals were formed to stop crimes of these particular countries after revolution. Judges and Political Influence It is the duty of a judge to make decisions that are righteous and impartial, but in some cases, such decisions can be hindered when politics comes in play (Kahler, 2015). There are cases when political leaders might deny judgeship to a person based on decisions they made that the political parties might not have been in favor of. Such members might ridicule judges over media to unseat them. Conclusion Hence, by the facts stated in and analyzed in the given report, it can be stated that since it is obvious that law and the people involved in the process of taking lawful actions against criminal offences are all either connected or selected by the political party, the president, the governor, the congress or the senate, it can be rightfully stated that in the case of Criminal Justice, since the start of democracy and even before was directly or indirectly influences by actions that were taken to benefit politics or to favor a party or an individual so involved. However, the few examples stated above also throw light on the fact that justice is still worth striving for and how few of the international bodies have done so over the years. They are an ideal model and our aim should be to emulate that in the field of international criminal justice. References Akhavan, P., 2013. The rise, and fall, and rise, of International Criminal Justice.Journal of international criminal justice,11(3), pp.527-536. Anon, (2017). [online] Available at: :https://www.capitalregionlawyers.com/ [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017]. Baylis, J., Owens, P. and Smith, S. eds., 2017.The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press. Bosco, D., 2013.Rough justice: The International Criminal Court in a world of power politics. Oxford University Press. Cliffsnotes.com. (2017).The Politics of Criminal Justice. [online] Available at: https://www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/criminal-justice/the-criminal-justice-system/the-politics-of-criminal-justice [Accessed 15 Oct. 2017]. Daily Kos. (2017).The Ways Politics Influences Criminal Justice. [online] Available at: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2015/12/13/1459761/-The-Ways-Politics-Influences-Criminal-Justice [Accessed 14 Oct. 2017]. Findlay, M.J., 2013.Governing through globalised crime: Futures for international criminal justice. Willan. Kahler, M. ed., 2015.Networked politics: agency, power, and governance. Cornell University Press. Lamont, C.K., 2016.International criminal justice and the politics of compliance. Routledge. Luban, D., 2013. After the honeymoon: reflections on the current state of international criminal justice.Journal of International Criminal Justice,11(3), pp.505-515.